Finished first rough draft
This commit is contained in:
parent
1d014f3225
commit
4c82a5cc26
@ -1,5 +1,36 @@
|
|||||||
% ************************** Thesis Abstract *****************************
|
% ************************** Thesis Abstract *****************************
|
||||||
% Use `abstract' as an option in the document class to print only the titlepage and the abstract.
|
% Use `abstract' as an option in the document class to print only the titlepage and the abstract.
|
||||||
\begin{abstract}
|
\begin{abstract}
|
||||||
This is where you write your abstract ...
|
Trapping ultracold atoms in optical lattices enabled the study of
|
||||||
|
strongly correlated phenomena in an environment that is far more
|
||||||
|
controllable and tunable than what was possible in condensed
|
||||||
|
matter. Here, we consider coupling these systems to quantized light
|
||||||
|
where the quantum nature of both the optical and matter fields play
|
||||||
|
equally important roles in order to push the boundaries of
|
||||||
|
what is possible in ultracold atomic systems.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We show that light can serve as a nondestructive probe of the
|
||||||
|
quantum state of the matter. By condering a global
|
||||||
|
measurement scheme we show that it is possible to distinguish a
|
||||||
|
highly delocalised phase like a superfluid from insulators. We also
|
||||||
|
demonstrate that light scattering reveals not only density
|
||||||
|
correlations, but also matter-field interference.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
By taking into account the effect of measurement backaction we show
|
||||||
|
that the measurement can efficiently compete with the local atomic
|
||||||
|
dynamics of the quantum gas. This can generate long-range
|
||||||
|
correlations and entanglement which in turn leads to macroscopic
|
||||||
|
multimode oscillations accross the whole lattice when the
|
||||||
|
measurement is weak and correlated tunneling, as well as selective
|
||||||
|
suppression and enhancement of dynamical processes beyond the
|
||||||
|
projective limit of the quantum Zeno effect in the strong
|
||||||
|
measurement regime.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We also consider quantum measurement backaction due to the
|
||||||
|
measurement of matter-phase-related variables such as global phase
|
||||||
|
coherence. We show how this unconventional approach opens up new
|
||||||
|
opportunities to affect system evolution and demonstrate how this
|
||||||
|
can lead to a new class of measurement projections, thus extending
|
||||||
|
the measurement postulate for the case of strong competition with
|
||||||
|
the system’s own evolution.
|
||||||
\end{abstract}
|
\end{abstract}
|
||||||
|
@ -12,46 +12,206 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The field of ultracold gases has been a rapidly growing field ever
|
The field of ultracold gases has been a rapidly growing field ever
|
||||||
since the first Bose-Einstein condensate was obtained in 1995. This
|
since the first Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) was obtained in 1995
|
||||||
new quantum state of matter is characterised by a macroscopic
|
\cite{anderson1995, bradley1995, davis1995}. This new quantum state of
|
||||||
occupancy of the single particle ground state at which point the whole
|
matter is characterised by a macroscopic occupancy of the single
|
||||||
system behaves like a single quantum object. This was revolutionary as
|
particle ground state at which point the whole system behaves like a
|
||||||
it enabled the study of coherent properties of macroscopic systems
|
single many-body quantum object \cite{PitaevskiiStringari}. This was
|
||||||
rather than single atoms or photons. Furthermore, the advanced state
|
revolutionary as it enabled the study of coherent properties of
|
||||||
of laser cooling and manipulation technologies meant that the degree
|
macroscopic systems rather than single atoms or photons. Furthermore,
|
||||||
of control and isolation from the environment was far greater than was
|
the advanced state of laser cooling and manipulation technologies
|
||||||
possible in condensed matter systems. Initially, the main focus of the
|
meant that the degree of control and isolation from the environment
|
||||||
|
was far greater than was possible in condensed matter systems
|
||||||
|
\cite{lewenstein2007, bloch2008}. Initially, the main focus of the
|
||||||
research was on the properties of coherent matter waves, such as
|
research was on the properties of coherent matter waves, such as
|
||||||
interference properties, long range phase coherence, or quantised
|
interference properties \cite{andrews1997}, long range phase coherence
|
||||||
vortices. Fermi degeneracy in ultracold gases was obtained shortly
|
\cite{bloch2000}, or quantised vortices \cite{matthews1999,
|
||||||
afterwards opening a similar field for fermions.
|
madison2000, abo2001}. Fermi degeneracy in ultracold gases was
|
||||||
|
obtained shortly afterwards opening a similar field for fermions
|
||||||
|
\cite{demarco1999, schreck2001, truscott2001}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In 1998 it was shown that a degenerate ultracold gas trapped in an
|
In 1998 it was shown that a degenerate ultracold gas trapped in an
|
||||||
optical lattice is a near-perfect realisation of the Bose-Hubbard
|
optical lattice is a near-perfect realisation of the Bose-Hubbard
|
||||||
model and in 2002 it was already demonstrated in a ground-breaking
|
model \cite{jaksch1998} and in 2002 it was already demonstrated in a
|
||||||
experiment. The Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian was already known in the
|
ground-breaking experiment \cite{greiner2002}. The Bose-Hubbard
|
||||||
field of condensed matter where it was considered a simple toy
|
Hamiltonian was previously known in the field of condensed matter
|
||||||
model. Despite its simplicity the model exhibits a variety of
|
where it was considered a simple toy model. Despite its simplicity the
|
||||||
different interesting phenomena such as the quantum phase transition
|
model exhibits a variety of different interesting phenomena such as
|
||||||
from a delocalised superfluid state to a Mott insulator as the on-site
|
the quantum phase transition from a delocalised superfluid state to a
|
||||||
interaction is increased above a critical point. In contrast to a
|
Mott insulator as the on-site interaction is increased above a
|
||||||
thermodynamic phase transition, a quantum phase transition is driven
|
critical point which was originally studied in the context of liquid
|
||||||
by quantum fluctuations and can occur at zero temperature. The ability
|
helium \cite{fisher1989}. In contrast to a thermodynamic phase
|
||||||
|
transition, a quantum phase transition is driven by quantum
|
||||||
|
fluctuations and can occur at zero temperature. The ability to achieve
|
||||||
|
a Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian where the model parameters can be easily
|
||||||
|
tuned by varying the lattice potential opened up a new regime in the
|
||||||
|
many-body physics of atomic gases. Unlike Bose-Einstein condensates in
|
||||||
|
free space which are described by weakly interacting theories
|
||||||
|
\cite{dalfovo1999}, the behaviour of ultracold gases trapped in an
|
||||||
|
optical lattice is dominated by atomic interactions opening the
|
||||||
|
possibility of studying strongly correlated behaviour with
|
||||||
|
unprecendented control.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The modern field of ultracold gases is successful due to its
|
The modern field of ultracold gases is successful due to its
|
||||||
interdisciplinarity [1, 2]. Originally condensed matter effects are
|
interdisciplinarity \cite{lewenstein2007, bloch2008}. Originally
|
||||||
now mimicked in controlled atomic systems finding applications in
|
condensed matter effects are now mimicked in controlled atomic systems
|
||||||
areas such as quantum information processing (QIP). A really new
|
finding applications in areas such as quantum information
|
||||||
challenge is to identify novel phenomena which were unreasonable to
|
processing. A really new challenge is to identify novel phenomena
|
||||||
consider in condensed matter, but will become feasible in new systems.
|
which were unreasonable to consider in condensed matter, but will
|
||||||
One such direction is merging quantum optics and many-body physics [3,
|
become feasible in new systems. One such direction is merging quantum
|
||||||
4]. The former describes delicate effects such as quantum
|
optics and many-body physics \cite{mekhov2012, ritsch2013}. Quantum
|
||||||
measurement and state engineering, but for systems without strong
|
optics has been developping as a branch of quantum physics
|
||||||
many-body correlations (e.g. atomic ensembles). In the latter,
|
independently of the progress in the many-body community. It describes
|
||||||
decoherence destroys these effects in conventional condensed
|
delicate effects such as quantum measurement, state engineering, and
|
||||||
matter. Due to recent experimental progress, e.g. Bose-Einstein
|
systems that can generally be easily isolated from their environnment
|
||||||
condensates (BEC) in cavities [5–7], quantum optics of quantum gases
|
due to the non-interacting nature of photons \cite{Scully}. However,
|
||||||
can close this gap.
|
they are also the perfect candidate for studying open systems due the
|
||||||
|
advanced state of cavity technologies \cite{carmichael,
|
||||||
|
MeasurementControl}. On the other hand ultracold gases are now used
|
||||||
|
to study strongly correlated behaviour of complex macroscopic
|
||||||
|
ensembles where decoherence is not so easy to avoid or control. Recent
|
||||||
|
experimental progress in combining the two fields offered a very
|
||||||
|
promising candidate for taking many-body physics in a direction that
|
||||||
|
would not be possible for condensed matter \cite{baumann2010,
|
||||||
|
wolke2012, schmidt2014}. Two very recent breakthrough experiments
|
||||||
|
have even managed to couple an ultracold gas trapped in an optical
|
||||||
|
lattice to an optical cavity enabling the study of strongly correlated
|
||||||
|
systems coupled to quantized light fields where the quantum properties
|
||||||
|
of the atoms become imprinted in the scattered light
|
||||||
|
\cite{klinder2015, landig2016}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
There are three prominent directions in which the field of quantum
|
||||||
|
optics of quantum gases has progressed in. First, the use of quantised
|
||||||
|
light enables direct coupling to the quantum properties of the atoms
|
||||||
|
\cite{mekhov2007prl, mekhov2007prl, mekhov2012}. This allows us to
|
||||||
|
probe the many-body system in a nondestructive manner and under
|
||||||
|
certain conditions even perform quantum non-demolition (QND)
|
||||||
|
measurements. QND measurements were originally developed in the
|
||||||
|
context of quantum optics as a tool to measure a quantum system
|
||||||
|
without significantly disturbing it \cite{braginsky1977, unruh1978,
|
||||||
|
brune1990, brune1992}. This has naturally been extended into the
|
||||||
|
realm of ultracold gases where such non-demolition schemes have been
|
||||||
|
applied to both fermionic \cite{eckert2008qnd, roscilde2009} and
|
||||||
|
bosonic \cite{hauke2013, rogers2014}. In this thesis, we consider
|
||||||
|
light scattering in free space from a bosonic ultracold gas and show
|
||||||
|
that there are many prominent features that go beyond classical
|
||||||
|
optics. Even the scattering angular distribution is nontrivial with
|
||||||
|
Bragg conditions that are significantly different from the classical
|
||||||
|
case. Furthermore, we show that the direct coupling of quantised light
|
||||||
|
to the atomic systems enables the nondestructive probing beyond a
|
||||||
|
standard mean-field description. We demonstrate this by showing that
|
||||||
|
the whole phase diagram of a disordered one-dimensional Bose-Hubbard
|
||||||
|
Hamiltonian, which consists of the superfluid, Mott insulating, and
|
||||||
|
Bose glass phases, can be mapped from the properties of the scattered
|
||||||
|
light. Additionally, we go beyond standard QND approaches, which only
|
||||||
|
consider coupling to density observables, by also considering the
|
||||||
|
direct coupling of the quantised light to the interference between
|
||||||
|
neighbouring lattice sites. We show that not only is this possible to
|
||||||
|
achieve in a nondestructive manner, it is also achieved without the
|
||||||
|
need for single-site resolution. This is in contrast to the standard
|
||||||
|
destructive time-of-flight measurements currently used to perform
|
||||||
|
these measurements \cite{miyake2011}. Within a mean-field treatment
|
||||||
|
this enables probing of the order parameter as well as matter-field
|
||||||
|
quadratures and their squeezing. This can have an impact on atom-wave
|
||||||
|
metrology and information processing in areas where quantum optics has
|
||||||
|
already made progress, e.g.,~quantum imaging with pixellized sources
|
||||||
|
of non-classical light \cite{golubev2010, kolobov1999}, as an optical
|
||||||
|
lattice is a natural source of multimode nonclassical matter waves.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Second, coupling a quantum gas to a cavity also enables us to study
|
||||||
|
open system many-body dynamics either via dissipation where we have no
|
||||||
|
control over the coupling to the environment or via controlled state
|
||||||
|
reduction using the measurement backaction due to photodetections. A
|
||||||
|
lot of effort was expanded in an attempt to minimise the influence of
|
||||||
|
the environment in order to extend decoherence times. However,
|
||||||
|
theoretical progress in the field has shown that instead being an
|
||||||
|
obstacle, dissipation can actually be used as a tool in engineering
|
||||||
|
quantum states \cite{diehl2008}. Furthermore, as the environment
|
||||||
|
coupling is varied the system may exhibit sudden changes in the
|
||||||
|
properties of its steady state giving rise to dissipative phase
|
||||||
|
transitions \cite{carmichael1980, werner2005, capriotti2005,
|
||||||
|
morrison2008, eisert2010, bhaseen2012, diehl2010,
|
||||||
|
vznidarivc2011}. An alternative approach to open systems is to look
|
||||||
|
at quantum measurement where we consider a quantum state conditioned
|
||||||
|
on the outcome of a single experimental run \cite{carmichael,
|
||||||
|
MeasurementControl}. In this approach we consider the solutions to a
|
||||||
|
stochastic Schr\"{o}dinger equation which will be a pure state, which
|
||||||
|
in contrast to dissipative systems is generally not the case. The
|
||||||
|
question of measurement and its effect on the quantum state has been
|
||||||
|
around since the inception of quantum theory and still remains a
|
||||||
|
largely open question \cite{zurek2002}. It wasn't long after the first
|
||||||
|
condenste was obtained that theoretical work on the effects of
|
||||||
|
measurement on BECs appeared \cite{cirac1996, castin1997,
|
||||||
|
ruostekoski1997}. Recently, work has also begun on combining weak
|
||||||
|
measurement with the strongly correlated dynamics of ultracold gases
|
||||||
|
in optical lattices \cite{mekhov2009prl, mekhov2009pra, mekhov2012,
|
||||||
|
douglas2012, douglas2013, ashida2015, ashida2015a}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In this thesis we focus on the latter by considering a quantum gas in
|
||||||
|
an optical lattice coupled to a cavity \cite{mekhov2012}. This
|
||||||
|
provides us with a flexible setup where the global light scattering
|
||||||
|
can be engineered. We show that this introduces a new competing energy
|
||||||
|
scale into the system and by considering continuous measurement, as
|
||||||
|
opposed to discrete projective measurements, we demonstrate the
|
||||||
|
quantum backaction can effectively compete with the standard
|
||||||
|
short-range processes of the Bose-Hubbard model. The global nature of
|
||||||
|
the optical fields leads to new phenomena driven by long-range
|
||||||
|
correlations that arise from the measurement. The flexibility of the
|
||||||
|
optical setup lets us not only consider coupling to different
|
||||||
|
observables, but by carefully choosing the optical geometry we can
|
||||||
|
suppress or enhace specific dynamical processes, realising spatially
|
||||||
|
nonlocal quantum Zeno dynamics.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The quantum Zeno effect happens when frequent measurements slow the
|
||||||
|
evolution of a quantum system \cite{misra1977, facchi2008}. This
|
||||||
|
effect was already considered by von Neumann and it has been
|
||||||
|
successfully observed in a variety of systems \cite{itano1990,
|
||||||
|
nagels1997, kwiat1999, balzer2000, streed2006, hosten2006,
|
||||||
|
bernu2008}. The generalisation of this effect to measurements with
|
||||||
|
multidimensional projections leads to quantum Zeno dynamics where
|
||||||
|
unitary evolution is uninhibited within this degenerate subspace,
|
||||||
|
i.e. the Zeno subspace \cite{facchi2008, raimond2010, raimond2012,
|
||||||
|
signoles2014}. Here, by combining quantum optical measurements with
|
||||||
|
the complex Hilbert space of a many-body quantum gas we go beyond
|
||||||
|
conventional quantum Zeno dynamics. By considering the case of
|
||||||
|
measurement near, but not in, the projective limit the system is still
|
||||||
|
confined to a Zeno subspace, but intermediate transitions are allowed
|
||||||
|
via virtual Raman-like processes. In a lattice system, like the
|
||||||
|
Bose-Hubbard model we can use global measurement to engineer these
|
||||||
|
dynamics to be highly nonlocal leading to the generation of long-range
|
||||||
|
correlations and entanglement. Furthermore, we show that this
|
||||||
|
behaviour can be approximated by a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian thus
|
||||||
|
extending the notion of quantum Zeno dynamics into the realm of
|
||||||
|
non-Hermitian quantum mechanics joining the two
|
||||||
|
paradigms. Non-Hermitian systems themself exhibit a range of
|
||||||
|
interesting phenomena ranging from localisation \cite{hatano1996,
|
||||||
|
refael2006} and $\mathcal{PT}$ symmetry \cite{bender1998,
|
||||||
|
giorgi2010, zhang2013} to spatial order \cite{otterbach2014} and
|
||||||
|
novel phase transitions \cite{lee2014prx, lee2014prl}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Just like for the nondestructive measurements we also consider
|
||||||
|
measurement backaction due to coupling to the interference terms
|
||||||
|
between the lattice sites. This effectively amounts to coupling to the
|
||||||
|
phase observables of the system. As this is the conjugate variable of
|
||||||
|
density, this allows to enter a new regime of quantum control using
|
||||||
|
measurement backaction. Whilst such interference measurements have
|
||||||
|
been previously proposed for BECs in double-wells \cite{cirac1996,
|
||||||
|
castin1997, ruostekoski1997}, the extension to a lattice system is
|
||||||
|
not straightforward, but we will show it is possible to achieve with
|
||||||
|
our propsed setup by a careful optical arrangement. Within this
|
||||||
|
context we demonstrate a novel type of projection which occurs even
|
||||||
|
when there is significant competition with the Hamiltonian
|
||||||
|
dynamics. This projection is fundamentally different to the standard
|
||||||
|
formulation of the Copenhagen postulate projection or the quantum Zeno
|
||||||
|
effect \cite{misra1977, facchi2008} thus providing an extension of the
|
||||||
|
measurement postulate to dynamical systems subject to weak
|
||||||
|
measurement.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Finally, the cavity field that builds up from the scattered photons
|
||||||
|
can also create a quantum optical potential which will modify the
|
||||||
|
Hamiltonian in a way that depends on the state of the atoms that
|
||||||
|
scatterd the light. This can lead to new quantum phases due to new
|
||||||
|
types of long-range interactions being mediated by the global quantum
|
||||||
|
optical fields \cite{caballero2015, caballero2015njp, caballero2016,
|
||||||
|
caballero2016a}. However, this aspect of quantum optics of quantum
|
||||||
|
gases is beyond the scope of this thesis.
|
||||||
|
@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ the system in different parameter regimes, such as nondestructive
|
|||||||
measurement in free space or quantum measurement backaction in a
|
measurement in free space or quantum measurement backaction in a
|
||||||
cavity. Another interesting direction for this field of research are
|
cavity. Another interesting direction for this field of research are
|
||||||
quantum optical lattices where the trapping potential is treated
|
quantum optical lattices where the trapping potential is treated
|
||||||
quantum mechanically. However this is beyond the scope of this work.
|
quantum mechanically \cite{caballero2015, caballero2015njp,
|
||||||
|
caballero2016, caballero2016a}. However this is beyond the scope of
|
||||||
\mynote{insert our paper citations here}
|
this work.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We consider $N$ two-level atoms in an optical lattice with $M$
|
We consider $N$ two-level atoms in an optical lattice with $M$
|
||||||
sites. For simplicity we will restrict our attention to spinless
|
sites. For simplicity we will restrict our attention to spinless
|
||||||
@ -39,25 +39,23 @@ from a small number of sites with a large filling factor (e.g.~BECs
|
|||||||
trapped in a double-well potential) to a an extended multi-site
|
trapped in a double-well potential) to a an extended multi-site
|
||||||
lattice with a low filling factor (e.g.~a system with one atom per
|
lattice with a low filling factor (e.g.~a system with one atom per
|
||||||
site which will exhibit the Mott insulator to superfluid quantum phase
|
site which will exhibit the Mott insulator to superfluid quantum phase
|
||||||
transition).
|
transition).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\mynote{extra fermion citations, Piazza? Look up Gabi's AF paper.}
|
An optical lattice can be formed with classical light beams that form
|
||||||
|
standing waves. Depending on the detuning with respect to the atomic
|
||||||
As we have seen in the previous section, an optical lattice can be
|
resonance, the nodes or antinodes form the lattice sites in which
|
||||||
formed with classical light beams that form standing waves. Depending
|
atoms accumulate. As shown in Fig. \ref{fig:LatticeDiagram} the
|
||||||
on the detuning with respect to the atomic resonance, the nodes or
|
trapped bosons (green) are illuminated with a coherent probe beam
|
||||||
antinodes form the lattice sites in which atoms accumulate. As shown
|
(red) and scatter light into a different mode (blue) which is then
|
||||||
in Fig. \ref{fig:LatticeDiagram} the trapped bosons (green) are
|
measured with a detector. The most straightforward measurement is to
|
||||||
illuminated with a coherent probe beam (red) and scatter light into a
|
simply count the number of photons with a photodetector, but it is
|
||||||
different mode (blue) which is then measured with a detector. The most
|
also possible to perform a quadrature measurement by using a homodyne
|
||||||
straightforward measurement is to simply count the number of photons
|
detection scheme. The experiment can be performed in free space where
|
||||||
with a photodetector, but it is also possible to perform a quadrature
|
light can scatter in any direction. The atoms can also be placed
|
||||||
measurement by using a homodyne detection scheme. The experiment can
|
inside a cavity which has the advantage of being able to enhance light
|
||||||
be performed in free space where light can scatter in any
|
scattering in a particular direction. Furthermore, cavities allow for
|
||||||
direction. The atoms can also be placed inside a cavity which has the
|
the formation of a fully quantum potential in contrast to the
|
||||||
advantage of being able to enhance light scattering in a particular
|
classical lattice trap.
|
||||||
direction. Furthermore, cavities allow for the formation of a fully
|
|
||||||
quantum potential in contrast to the classical lattice trap.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}[htbp!]
|
\begin{figure}[htbp!]
|
||||||
\centering
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -9,3 +9,111 @@
|
|||||||
\else
|
\else
|
||||||
\graphicspath{{Chapter7/Figs/Vector/}{Chapter7/Figs/}}
|
\graphicspath{{Chapter7/Figs/Vector/}{Chapter7/Figs/}}
|
||||||
\fi
|
\fi
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Quantum optics of quantum gases explores the ultimate quantum regime
|
||||||
|
of light-matter interactions where both the optical and matter fields
|
||||||
|
are fully quantised. It provides a very rich system in which new
|
||||||
|
phenomena can be observed, engineered, and controlled beyond what
|
||||||
|
would be possible in condensed matter. Combined with rapid and
|
||||||
|
promising experimental progress in this field the theoretical
|
||||||
|
proposals have the potential of directing the research in the
|
||||||
|
foreseeable future \cite{baumann2010, wolke2012, schmidt2014,
|
||||||
|
klinder2015, landig2016}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In this thesis we focused on the coupling between global quantised
|
||||||
|
optical fields and an ultracold bosonic quantum gas. By considering
|
||||||
|
global fields as opposed to localised light-matter interactions we
|
||||||
|
were able to introduce several nonlocal properties to the Hamiltonian
|
||||||
|
in a controllable manner which would otherwise be impossible to
|
||||||
|
implement. We showed how this can be useful in the context of
|
||||||
|
nondestructive probing by showing that it can easily distinguish
|
||||||
|
between a highly delocalised quantum state such as a superfluid and
|
||||||
|
insulating states such as the Mott insulator and the Bose glass phases
|
||||||
|
which is currently a challenge \cite{derrico2014}. Furthermore, we
|
||||||
|
have seen how the correlation length, which would be inaccessible in
|
||||||
|
localised measurements, was immediately visible in our scheme and lead
|
||||||
|
to an angular scattering pattern that was far richer than it was for
|
||||||
|
the classical case. This is best highlighted by the fact that it would
|
||||||
|
be visible even when classically no light would scatter coherently at
|
||||||
|
all.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
More interestingly, the global nature of the measurement was also
|
||||||
|
capable of creating such long-range correlations itself when we
|
||||||
|
considered measurement backaction. This was most visible when we saw
|
||||||
|
how weak measurement was capable of driving global macroscopic
|
||||||
|
multimode oscillations between different spatial modes, such as odd
|
||||||
|
and even sites, across the whole lattice which could be used for
|
||||||
|
quantum information and metrology. Such dynamical states show spatial
|
||||||
|
density-density correlations with nontrivial periods and long-range
|
||||||
|
coherence, thus having supersolid properties, but as an essentially
|
||||||
|
dynamical version. Furthermore, the tunability of the optical
|
||||||
|
arrangement meant that we had extreme flexibility in choosing our
|
||||||
|
observables, effectively tailoring the long-range entanglement and
|
||||||
|
correlations in the system. We have also shown how global measurement
|
||||||
|
when combined with both atomic tunnelling and interactions leads to
|
||||||
|
highly nontrivial dynamics in which backaction can either compete or
|
||||||
|
cooperate with on-site repulsion in squeezing the atomic variables.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In the limit of strong measurement when quantum Zeno dynamics occurs
|
||||||
|
we showed that these nonlocal spatial modes created by the global
|
||||||
|
measurement lead to long-range correlated tunnelling events whilst
|
||||||
|
suppressing any other dynamics between different spatial modes of the
|
||||||
|
measurement. Such globally paired tunneling due to a fundamentally
|
||||||
|
novel phenomenon can enrich physics of long-range correlated systems
|
||||||
|
beyond relatively shortrange interactions expected from standard
|
||||||
|
dipole-dipole interactions \cite{sowinski2012, omjyoti2015}. These
|
||||||
|
nonlocal high-order processes entangle regions of the optical lattice
|
||||||
|
that are disconnected by the measurement. Using different detection
|
||||||
|
schemes, we showed how to tailor density-density correlations between
|
||||||
|
distant lattice sites. Quantum optical engineering of nonlocal
|
||||||
|
coupling to environment, combined with quantum measurement, can allow
|
||||||
|
the design of nontrivial system-bath interactions, enabling new links
|
||||||
|
to quantum simulations \cite{stannigel2013} and thermodynamics
|
||||||
|
\cite{erez2008}. Interestingly, these dynamics also provide a link to
|
||||||
|
non-Hermitian quantum mechanics as this regime of measurement can be
|
||||||
|
accurately described with a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. Furthermore, we
|
||||||
|
show that this allows for a rather novel type of competition between
|
||||||
|
measurement and tunnelling where both processes actually cooperate to
|
||||||
|
produce a steady state in which tunnelling is suppressed by
|
||||||
|
destructive matter-wave interference.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A unique feature of our global measurement scheme meant that we could
|
||||||
|
couple directly to the phase observables of the system by coupling to
|
||||||
|
the interference between the lattice sites, which represents the
|
||||||
|
shortest meaningful distance in an optical lattice, rather than their
|
||||||
|
on-site density. This defines most processes in optical lattices. For
|
||||||
|
example, matter-field phase changes may happen not only due to
|
||||||
|
external gradients, but also due to intriguing effects such quantum
|
||||||
|
jumps leading to phase flips at neighbouring sites and sudden
|
||||||
|
cancellation of tunneling \cite{vukics2007}, which should be
|
||||||
|
accessible by this method. Furthremore, in mean-field one can measure
|
||||||
|
the matter-field amplitude (which is also the order parameter),
|
||||||
|
quadratures and their squeezing. This can link atom optics to areas
|
||||||
|
where quantum optics has already made progress, e.g., quantum imaging
|
||||||
|
\cite{golubev2010, kolobov1999}, using an optical lattice as an array
|
||||||
|
of multimode nonclassical matter- field sources with a high degree of
|
||||||
|
entanglement for quantum information processing. We have also shown
|
||||||
|
how this scheme of coupling to phase observables can be used in the
|
||||||
|
context of quantum measurement backaction to achieve a new degree of
|
||||||
|
control. We used this result to show a generalisation of weak
|
||||||
|
measurement on dynamical systems by showing that there is now a new
|
||||||
|
class of projections available even when the measurement is not a
|
||||||
|
compatible observable of the Hamiltonian. This an interesting result
|
||||||
|
as the projections themselves are unlike those postulated by the
|
||||||
|
Copenhagen interpretation, those present in quantum Zeno dynamic, or
|
||||||
|
even those possible to engineer using dissipative methods.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In this thesis we have covered significant areas of the broad field
|
||||||
|
that is quantum optics of quantum gases, but there is much more that
|
||||||
|
has been left untouched. Here, we have only considered spinless
|
||||||
|
bosons, but the theory can also been extended to fermions
|
||||||
|
\cite{atoms2015, mazzucchi2016, mazzucchi2016af} and
|
||||||
|
molecules \cite{LP2013} and potentially even photonic circuits
|
||||||
|
\cite{mazzucchi2016njp}. Furthermore, the question of quantum
|
||||||
|
measurement and its properties has been a subject of heated debate
|
||||||
|
since the very origins of quantum theory yet it is still as mysterious
|
||||||
|
as it was at the beginning of the $20^\mathrm{th}$ century. However,
|
||||||
|
this work has hopefully demonstrated that coupling quantised light
|
||||||
|
fields to many-body systems provides a very rich playground for
|
||||||
|
exploring new quantum mechanical phenomena beyond what would otherwise
|
||||||
|
be possible in other fields.
|
||||||
|
@ -2,6 +2,15 @@
|
|||||||
%% Books, theses, reference material
|
%% Books, theses, reference material
|
||||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@book{carmichael,
|
||||||
|
title={An open systems approach to quantum optics: lectures
|
||||||
|
presented at the Universit{\'e} Libre de Bruxelles,
|
||||||
|
October 28 to November 4, 1991},
|
||||||
|
author={Carmichael, Howard},
|
||||||
|
volume={18},
|
||||||
|
year={2009},
|
||||||
|
publisher={Springer Science \& Business Media}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
@book{foot,
|
@book{foot,
|
||||||
author = {Foot, C. J.},
|
author = {Foot, C. J.},
|
||||||
title = {{Atomic Physics}},
|
title = {{Atomic Physics}},
|
||||||
@ -243,8 +252,10 @@ year = {2010}
|
|||||||
publisher={IOP Publishing}
|
publisher={IOP Publishing}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@article{caballero2016,
|
@article{caballero2016,
|
||||||
title = {Quantum simulators based on the global collective light-matter interaction},
|
title = {Quantum simulators based on the global collective
|
||||||
author = {Caballero-Benitez, Santiago F. and Mazzucchi, Gabriel and Mekhov, Igor B.},
|
light-matter interaction},
|
||||||
|
author = {Caballero-Benitez, Santiago F. and Mazzucchi, Gabriel and
|
||||||
|
Mekhov, Igor B.},
|
||||||
journal = {Phys. Rev. A},
|
journal = {Phys. Rev. A},
|
||||||
volume = {93},
|
volume = {93},
|
||||||
issue = {6},
|
issue = {6},
|
||||||
@ -1225,3 +1236,513 @@ doi = {10.1103/PhysRevA.87.043613},
|
|||||||
year={1981},
|
year={1981},
|
||||||
publisher={APS}
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{anderson1995,
|
||||||
|
title={Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic
|
||||||
|
Vapor},
|
||||||
|
author={Anderson, MH and Ensher, JR and Matthews, MR and Wieman, CE
|
||||||
|
and Cornell, EA},
|
||||||
|
journal={science},
|
||||||
|
volume={269},
|
||||||
|
pages={14},
|
||||||
|
year={1995}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{bradley1995,
|
||||||
|
title={Evidence of Bose-Einstein condensation in an atomic gas with
|
||||||
|
attractive interactions},
|
||||||
|
author={Bradley, Cl C and Sackett, CA and Tollett, JJ and Hulet,
|
||||||
|
Randall G},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical Review Letters},
|
||||||
|
volume={75},
|
||||||
|
number={9},
|
||||||
|
pages={1687},
|
||||||
|
year={1995},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{davis1995,
|
||||||
|
title={Bose-Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms},
|
||||||
|
author={Davis, Kendall B and Mewes, M-O and Andrews, Michael R and
|
||||||
|
Van Druten, NJ and Durfee, DS and Kurn, DM and
|
||||||
|
Ketterle, Wolfgang},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical review letters},
|
||||||
|
volume={75},
|
||||||
|
number={22},
|
||||||
|
pages={3969},
|
||||||
|
year={1995},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{bloch2008,
|
||||||
|
title={Many-body physics with ultracold gases},
|
||||||
|
author={Bloch, Immanuel and Dalibard, Jean and Zwerger, Wilhelm},
|
||||||
|
journal={Reviews of Modern Physics},
|
||||||
|
volume={80},
|
||||||
|
number={3},
|
||||||
|
pages={885},
|
||||||
|
year={2008},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{lewenstein2007,
|
||||||
|
title={Ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices: mimicking
|
||||||
|
condensed matter physics and beyond},
|
||||||
|
author={Lewenstein, Maciej and Sanpera, Anna and Ahufinger, Veronica
|
||||||
|
and Damski, Bogdan and Sen, Aditi and Sen, Ujjwal},
|
||||||
|
journal={Advances in Physics},
|
||||||
|
volume={56},
|
||||||
|
number={2},
|
||||||
|
pages={243--379},
|
||||||
|
year={2007},
|
||||||
|
publisher={Taylor \& Francis}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{andrews1997,
|
||||||
|
title={Observation of interference between two Bose condensates},
|
||||||
|
author={Andrews, MR and Townsend, CG and Miesner, H-J and Durfee, DS
|
||||||
|
and Kurn, DM and Ketterle, W},
|
||||||
|
journal={Science},
|
||||||
|
volume={275},
|
||||||
|
number={5300},
|
||||||
|
pages={637--641},
|
||||||
|
year={1997},
|
||||||
|
publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{bloch2000,
|
||||||
|
title={Measurement of the spatial coherence of a trapped Bose gas at
|
||||||
|
the phase transition},
|
||||||
|
author={Bloch, I and H{\"a}nsch, Th W and Esslinger, T},
|
||||||
|
journal={Nature},
|
||||||
|
volume={403},
|
||||||
|
number={6766},
|
||||||
|
pages={166--170},
|
||||||
|
year={2000},
|
||||||
|
publisher={Nature Publishing Group}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{matthews1999,
|
||||||
|
title={Vortices in a Bose-Einstein condensate},
|
||||||
|
author={Matthews, Michael Robin and Anderson, Brian P and Haljan, PC
|
||||||
|
and Hall, DS and Wieman, CE and Cornell, EA},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical Review Letters},
|
||||||
|
volume={83},
|
||||||
|
number={13},
|
||||||
|
pages={2498},
|
||||||
|
year={1999},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{madison2000,
|
||||||
|
title={Vortex formation in a stirred Bose-Einstein condensate},
|
||||||
|
author={Madison, KW and Chevy, F and Wohlleben, W and Dalibard, J},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical Review Letters},
|
||||||
|
volume={84},
|
||||||
|
number={5},
|
||||||
|
pages={806},
|
||||||
|
year={2000},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{abo2001,
|
||||||
|
title={Observation of vortex lattices in Bose-Einstein condensates},
|
||||||
|
author={Abo-Shaeer, JR and Raman, C and Vogels, JM and Ketterle, Wolfgang},
|
||||||
|
journal={Science},
|
||||||
|
volume={292},
|
||||||
|
number={5516},
|
||||||
|
pages={476--479},
|
||||||
|
year={2001},
|
||||||
|
publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{demarco1999,
|
||||||
|
title={Onset of Fermi degeneracy in a trapped atomic gas},
|
||||||
|
author={DeMarco, Brian and Jin, Deborah S},
|
||||||
|
journal={Science},
|
||||||
|
volume={285},
|
||||||
|
number={5434},
|
||||||
|
pages={1703--1706},
|
||||||
|
year={1999},
|
||||||
|
publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{schreck2001,
|
||||||
|
title={Quasipure Bose-Einstein condensate immersed in a Fermi sea},
|
||||||
|
author={Schreck, F and Khaykovich, Lev and Corwin, KL and Ferrari, G
|
||||||
|
and Bourdel, Thomas and Cubizolles, Julien and
|
||||||
|
Salomon, Christophe},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical Review Letters},
|
||||||
|
volume={87},
|
||||||
|
number={8},
|
||||||
|
pages={080403},
|
||||||
|
year={2001},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{truscott2001,
|
||||||
|
title={Observation of Fermi pressure in a gas of trapped atoms},
|
||||||
|
author={Truscott, Andrew G and Strecker, Kevin E and McAlexander,
|
||||||
|
William I and Partridge, Guthrie B and Hulet,
|
||||||
|
Randall G},
|
||||||
|
journal={Science},
|
||||||
|
volume={291},
|
||||||
|
number={5513},
|
||||||
|
pages={2570--2572},
|
||||||
|
year={2001},
|
||||||
|
publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{dalfovo1999,
|
||||||
|
title={Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases},
|
||||||
|
author={Dalfovo, Franco and Giorgini, Stefano and Pitaevskii, Lev P
|
||||||
|
and Stringari, Sandro},
|
||||||
|
journal={Reviews of Modern Physics},
|
||||||
|
volume={71},
|
||||||
|
number={3},
|
||||||
|
pages={463},
|
||||||
|
year={1999},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{ritsch2013,
|
||||||
|
title={Cold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical potentials},
|
||||||
|
author={Ritsch, Helmut and Domokos, Peter and Brennecke, Ferdinand
|
||||||
|
and Esslinger, Tilman},
|
||||||
|
journal={Reviews of Modern Physics},
|
||||||
|
volume={85},
|
||||||
|
number={2},
|
||||||
|
pages={553},
|
||||||
|
year={2013},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{baumann2010,
|
||||||
|
title={Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity},
|
||||||
|
author={Baumann, Kristian and Guerlin, Christine and Brennecke,
|
||||||
|
Ferdinand and Esslinger, Tilman},
|
||||||
|
journal={Nature},
|
||||||
|
volume={464},
|
||||||
|
number={7293},
|
||||||
|
pages={1301--1306},
|
||||||
|
year={2010},
|
||||||
|
publisher={Nature Publishing Group}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{wolke2012,
|
||||||
|
title={Cavity cooling below the recoil limit},
|
||||||
|
author={Wolke, Matthias and Klinner, Julian and Ke{\ss}ler, Hans and
|
||||||
|
Hemmerich, Andreas},
|
||||||
|
journal={Science},
|
||||||
|
volume={337},
|
||||||
|
number={6090},
|
||||||
|
pages={75--78},
|
||||||
|
year={2012},
|
||||||
|
publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{schmidt2014,
|
||||||
|
title={Dynamical Instability of a Bose-Einstein Condensate in an
|
||||||
|
Optical Ring Resonator},
|
||||||
|
author={Schmidt, D and Tomczyk, H and Slama, S and Zimmermann, C},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical review letters},
|
||||||
|
volume={112},
|
||||||
|
number={11},
|
||||||
|
pages={115302},
|
||||||
|
year={2014},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{landig2016,
|
||||||
|
title={Quantum phases from competing short-and long-range
|
||||||
|
interactions in an optical lattice},
|
||||||
|
author={Landig, Renate and Hruby, Lorenz and Dogra, Nishant and
|
||||||
|
Landini, Manuele and Mottl, Rafael and Donner,
|
||||||
|
Tobias and Esslinger, Tilman},
|
||||||
|
journal={Nature},
|
||||||
|
year={2016},
|
||||||
|
publisher={Nature Publishing Group}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{klinder2015,
|
||||||
|
title={Observation of a superradiant Mott insulator in the Dicke-Hubbard model},
|
||||||
|
author={Klinder, Jens and Ke{\ss}ler, H and Bakhtiari, M Reza and
|
||||||
|
Thorwart, M and Hemmerich, A},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical review letters},
|
||||||
|
volume={115},
|
||||||
|
number={23},
|
||||||
|
pages={230403},
|
||||||
|
year={2015},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{braginsky1977,
|
||||||
|
title={Topics in Theoretical and Experimental Gravitation Physics},
|
||||||
|
author={Braginsky, VB},
|
||||||
|
year={1977},
|
||||||
|
publisher={Plenum, New York}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{unruh1978,
|
||||||
|
title={Analysis of quantum-nondemolition measurement},
|
||||||
|
author={Unruh, WG},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical Review D},
|
||||||
|
volume={18},
|
||||||
|
number={6},
|
||||||
|
pages={1764},
|
||||||
|
year={1978},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{brune1990,
|
||||||
|
title={Quantum nondemolition measurement of small photon numbers by
|
||||||
|
Rydberg-atom phase-sensitive detection},
|
||||||
|
author={Brune, M and Haroche, S and Lefevre, V and Raimond, JM and Zagury, N},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical review letters},
|
||||||
|
volume={65},
|
||||||
|
number={8},
|
||||||
|
pages={976},
|
||||||
|
year={1990},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{roscilde2009,
|
||||||
|
title={Quantum polarization spectroscopy of correlations in attractive fermionic gases},
|
||||||
|
author={Roscilde, T and Rodriguez, M and Eckert, K and Romero-Isart,
|
||||||
|
O and Lewenstein, M and Polzik, E and Sanpera, A},
|
||||||
|
journal={New Journal of Physics},
|
||||||
|
volume={11},
|
||||||
|
number={5},
|
||||||
|
pages={055041},
|
||||||
|
year={2009},
|
||||||
|
publisher={IOP Publishing}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{eckert2008qnd,
|
||||||
|
title={Quantum non-demolition detection of strongly correlated systems},
|
||||||
|
author={Eckert, Kai and Romero-Isart, Oriol and Rodriguez, Mirta and
|
||||||
|
Lewenstein, Maciej and Polzik, Eugene S and Sanpera,
|
||||||
|
Anna},
|
||||||
|
journal={Nature Physics},
|
||||||
|
volume={4},
|
||||||
|
number={1},
|
||||||
|
pages={50--54},
|
||||||
|
year={2008},
|
||||||
|
publisher={Nature Publishing Group}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{hauke2013,
|
||||||
|
title={Quantum control of spin correlations in ultracold lattice gases},
|
||||||
|
author={Hauke, Philipp and Sewell, RJ and Mitchell, Morgan W and Lewenstein, Maciej},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical Review A},
|
||||||
|
volume={87},
|
||||||
|
number={2},
|
||||||
|
pages={021601},
|
||||||
|
year={2013},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{carmichael1980,
|
||||||
|
title={Analytical and numerical results for the steady state in
|
||||||
|
cooperative resonance fluorescence},
|
||||||
|
author={Carmichael, HJ},
|
||||||
|
journal={Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics},
|
||||||
|
volume={13},
|
||||||
|
number={18},
|
||||||
|
pages={3551},
|
||||||
|
year={1980},
|
||||||
|
publisher={IOP Publishing}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{werner2005,
|
||||||
|
title={Phase diagram and critical exponents of a dissipative Ising
|
||||||
|
spin chain in a transverse magnetic field},
|
||||||
|
author={Werner, Philipp and V{\"o}lker, Klaus and Troyer, Matthias
|
||||||
|
and Chakravarty, Sudip},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical review letters},
|
||||||
|
volume={94},
|
||||||
|
number={4},
|
||||||
|
pages={047201},
|
||||||
|
year={2005},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{capriotti2005,
|
||||||
|
title={Dissipation-driven phase transition in two-dimensional
|
||||||
|
Josephson arrays},
|
||||||
|
author={Capriotti, Luca and Cuccoli, Alessandro and Fubini, Andrea
|
||||||
|
and Tognetti, Valerio and Vaia, Ruggero},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical review letters},
|
||||||
|
volume={94},
|
||||||
|
number={15},
|
||||||
|
pages={157001},
|
||||||
|
year={2005},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{morrison2008,
|
||||||
|
title={Dissipation-driven quantum phase transitions in collective spin systems},
|
||||||
|
author={Morrison, S and Parkins, AS},
|
||||||
|
journal={Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics},
|
||||||
|
volume={41},
|
||||||
|
number={19},
|
||||||
|
pages={195502},
|
||||||
|
year={2008},
|
||||||
|
publisher={IOP Publishing}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{eisert2010,
|
||||||
|
title={Noise-driven quantum criticality},
|
||||||
|
author={Eisert, J and Prosen, T},
|
||||||
|
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1012.5013},
|
||||||
|
year={2010}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{bhaseen2012,
|
||||||
|
title={Dynamics of nonequilibrium Dicke models},
|
||||||
|
author={Bhaseen, MJ and Mayoh, J and Simons, BD and Keeling, J},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical Review A},
|
||||||
|
volume={85},
|
||||||
|
number={1},
|
||||||
|
pages={013817},
|
||||||
|
year={2012},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{diehl2010,
|
||||||
|
title={Dynamical phase transitions and instabilities in open atomic many-body systems},
|
||||||
|
author={Diehl, Sebastian and Tomadin, Andrea and Micheli, Andrea and
|
||||||
|
Fazio, Rosario and Zoller, Peter},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical review letters},
|
||||||
|
volume={105},
|
||||||
|
number={1},
|
||||||
|
pages={015702},
|
||||||
|
year={2010},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{vznidarivc2011,
|
||||||
|
title={Solvable quantum nonequilibrium model exhibiting a phase
|
||||||
|
transition and a matrix product representation},
|
||||||
|
author={{\v{Z}}nidari{\v{c}}, Marko},
|
||||||
|
journal={Physical Review E},
|
||||||
|
volume={83},
|
||||||
|
number={1},
|
||||||
|
pages={011108},
|
||||||
|
year={2011},
|
||||||
|
publisher={APS}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{itano1990,
|
||||||
|
title = {Quantum Zeno effect},
|
||||||
|
author = {Itano, Wayne M. and Heinzen, D. J. and Bollinger,
|
||||||
|
J. J. and Wineland, D. J.},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Phys. Rev. A},
|
||||||
|
volume = {41},
|
||||||
|
issue = {5},
|
||||||
|
pages = {2295--2300},
|
||||||
|
numpages = {0},
|
||||||
|
year = {1990},
|
||||||
|
month = {Mar},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {American Physical Society},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{nagels1997,
|
||||||
|
title = {Quantum Zeno Effect Induced by Collisions},
|
||||||
|
author = {Nagels, B. and Hermans, L. J. F. and Chapovsky, P. L.},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},
|
||||||
|
volume = {79},
|
||||||
|
issue = {17},
|
||||||
|
pages = {3097--3100},
|
||||||
|
numpages = {0},
|
||||||
|
year = {1997},
|
||||||
|
month = {Oct},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {American Physical Society},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{kwiat1999,
|
||||||
|
title = {High-Efficiency Quantum Interrogation Measurements via the Quantum Zeno Effect},
|
||||||
|
author = {Kwiat, P. G. and White, A. G. and Mitchell, J. R. and
|
||||||
|
Nairz, O. and Weihs, G. and Weinfurter, H. and
|
||||||
|
Zeilinger, A.},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},
|
||||||
|
volume = {83},
|
||||||
|
issue = {23},
|
||||||
|
pages = {4725--4728},
|
||||||
|
numpages = {0},
|
||||||
|
year = {1999},
|
||||||
|
month = {Dec},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {American Physical Society},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{balzer2000,
|
||||||
|
title = {The quantum Zeno effect – evolution of an atom impeded by measurement},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Optics Communications},
|
||||||
|
volume = {180},
|
||||||
|
number = {1–3},
|
||||||
|
pages = {115-120},
|
||||||
|
year = {2000},
|
||||||
|
author = {Chr. Balzer and R. Huesmann and W. Neuhauser and P.E. Toschek}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{streed2006,
|
||||||
|
title = {Continuous and Pulsed Quantum Zeno Effect},
|
||||||
|
author = {Streed, Erik W. and Mun, Jongchul and Boyd, Micah and
|
||||||
|
Campbell, Gretchen K. and Medley, Patrick and
|
||||||
|
Ketterle, Wolfgang and Pritchard, David E.},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},
|
||||||
|
volume = {97},
|
||||||
|
issue = {26},
|
||||||
|
pages = {260402},
|
||||||
|
numpages = {4},
|
||||||
|
year = {2006},
|
||||||
|
month = {Dec},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {American Physical Society},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{hosten2006,
|
||||||
|
title = {Counterfactual quantum computation through quantum interrogation},
|
||||||
|
author = {Hosten, Onur and Rakher, Matthew T. and Barreiro, Julio
|
||||||
|
T. and Peters, Nicholas A. and Kwiat, Paul G.},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Nature},
|
||||||
|
volume = {439},
|
||||||
|
issue = {7079},
|
||||||
|
pages = {949-952},
|
||||||
|
numpages = {4},
|
||||||
|
year = {2006},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{bernu2008,
|
||||||
|
title = {Freezing Coherent Field Growth in a Cavity by the Quantum Zeno Effect},
|
||||||
|
author = {Bernu, J. and Del\'eglise, S. and Sayrin, C. and Kuhr,
|
||||||
|
S. and Dotsenko, I. and Brune, M. and Raimond,
|
||||||
|
J. M. and Haroche, S.},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},
|
||||||
|
volume = {101},
|
||||||
|
issue = {18},
|
||||||
|
pages = {180402},
|
||||||
|
numpages = {4},
|
||||||
|
year = {2008},
|
||||||
|
month = {Oct},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {American Physical Society},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{hatano1996,
|
||||||
|
title = {Localization Transitions in Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics},
|
||||||
|
author = {Hatano, Naomichi and Nelson, David R.},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},
|
||||||
|
volume = {77},
|
||||||
|
issue = {3},
|
||||||
|
pages = {570--573},
|
||||||
|
numpages = {0},
|
||||||
|
year = {1996},
|
||||||
|
month = {Jul},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {American Physical Society},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{refael2006,
|
||||||
|
title = {Transverse Meissner physics of planar superconductors with columnar pins},
|
||||||
|
author = {Refael, Gil and Hofstetter, Walter and Nelson, David R.},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Phys. Rev. B},
|
||||||
|
volume = {74},
|
||||||
|
issue = {17},
|
||||||
|
pages = {174520},
|
||||||
|
numpages = {20},
|
||||||
|
year = {2006},
|
||||||
|
month = {Nov},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {American Physical Society},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{bender1998,
|
||||||
|
title = {Real Spectra in Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians Having $\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}$ Symmetry},
|
||||||
|
author = {Bender, Carl M. and Boettcher, Stefan},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Phys. Rev. Lett.},
|
||||||
|
volume = {80},
|
||||||
|
issue = {24},
|
||||||
|
pages = {5243--5246},
|
||||||
|
numpages = {0},
|
||||||
|
year = {1998},
|
||||||
|
month = {Jun},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {American Physical Society},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{giorgi2010,
|
||||||
|
title = {Spontaneous $\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}$ symmetry breaking and quantum phase transitions in dimerized spin chains},
|
||||||
|
author = {Giorgi, Gian Luca},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Phys. Rev. B},
|
||||||
|
volume = {82},
|
||||||
|
issue = {5},
|
||||||
|
pages = {052404},
|
||||||
|
numpages = {4},
|
||||||
|
year = {2010},
|
||||||
|
month = {Aug},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {American Physical Society},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@article{zhang2013,
|
||||||
|
title = {Non-Hermitian anisotropic $XY$ model with intrinsic
|
||||||
|
rotation-time-reversal symmetry},
|
||||||
|
author = {Zhang, X. Z. and Song, Z.},
|
||||||
|
journal = {Phys. Rev. A},
|
||||||
|
volume = {87},
|
||||||
|
issue = {1},
|
||||||
|
pages = {012114},
|
||||||
|
numpages = {7},
|
||||||
|
year = {2013},
|
||||||
|
month = {Jan},
|
||||||
|
publisher = {American Physical Society},
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||||||
% ******************************* PhD Thesis Template **************************
|
% ******************************* PhD Thesis Template **************************
|
||||||
% Please have a look at the README.md file for info on how to use the template
|
% Please have a look at the README.md file for info on how to use the template
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt,times,numbered,print,chapter]{Classes/PhDThesisPSnPDF}
|
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt,times,numbered,print]{Classes/PhDThesisPSnPDF}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% ******************************************************************************
|
% ******************************************************************************
|
||||||
% ******************************* Class Options ********************************
|
% ******************************* Class Options ********************************
|
||||||
@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
|
|||||||
% To use choose `chapter' option in the document class
|
% To use choose `chapter' option in the document class
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\ifdefineChapter
|
\ifdefineChapter
|
||||||
\includeonly{Chapter1/chapter1}
|
\includeonly{Abstract/Abstract}
|
||||||
\fi
|
\fi
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% ******************************** Front Matter ********************************
|
% ******************************** Front Matter ********************************
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user