mirror of
https://github.com/Wojtek242/route0.git
synced 2024-11-22 07:05:25 +01:00
Explain configuration model choice
This commit is contained in:
parent
97728ffe89
commit
b327103d44
20
README.md
20
README.md
@ -240,6 +240,26 @@ An experiment is simply a particular topology and scenario combination.
|
||||
Technically this is redundant since scenarios are strictly associated with only
|
||||
one topology, but using different terminology avoids confusion.
|
||||
|
||||
### A note on configuration files
|
||||
|
||||
The official FRR documentation recommends using only a single configuration
|
||||
file `frr.conf` per router. This makes sense if we are only running a single
|
||||
instance of each protocol on the device as then all the configuration is in one
|
||||
place. Route 0 does not do that. Using a single configuration file would mean
|
||||
that a lot of options would need to be repeated between different scenarios,
|
||||
especially for `zebra` and `staticd`.
|
||||
|
||||
Furthermore, separating the config files makes it easier for the python scripts
|
||||
to know which daemons to start (though of course it could just start all of
|
||||
them every time or use some additional configuration file).
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, one last advantage of the Route 0 configuration model for our use case
|
||||
is that the we group configurations per protocol, not per device. This makes
|
||||
no sense if you're running only one instance of a protocol on a given device,
|
||||
but since we are running multiple instances on multiple virtual nodes on a
|
||||
single physical device, it makes it easier to inspect and compare the
|
||||
configurations on a protocol level.
|
||||
|
||||
## Contributing
|
||||
|
||||
For information on how to contribute see [CONTRIBUTING](CONTRIBUTING.md).
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user